Municipales 2008 — Tour 2
11 862 bureaux · 11 782 617 inscrits · Participation moy. 62.7%
Score d'intégrité global
99
Arithmétique
poids: 30%
99
Statistique
poids: 25%
100
Historique
poids: 25%
100
Distribution
poids: 10%
100
Complétude
poids: 10%
Distribution par bureau
11 674
Cohérent (90+)
144
Léger (75-89)
39
Notable (50-74)
5
Prioritaire (<50)
Top anomalies (413 total)
| Sévérité | Type | Bureau | Inscrits | Explication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | high_null_rate | 35093_0005 | 870 | Bureau 35093_0005: 30.34% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 38189_0001 | 1 600 | Bureau 38189_0001: 26.77% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 62193_0012 | 786 | Bureau 62193_0012: 20.29% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 62193_0034 | 750 | Bureau 62193_0034: 20.09% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 63113_0025 | 1 314 | Bureau 63113_0025: 29.08% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 74133_0002 | 1 317 | Bureau 74133_0002: 25.57% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0005 | 762 | Bureau 94081_0005: 22.13% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0006 | 1 053 | Bureau 94081_0006: 24.85% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0007 | 857 | Bureau 94081_0007: 21.88% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0011 | 1 063 | Bureau 94081_0011: 24.92% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0012 | 877 | Bureau 94081_0012: 31.34% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0013 | 966 | Bureau 94081_0013: 39.21% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0016 | 775 | Bureau 94081_0016: 20.48% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0021 | 945 | Bureau 94081_0021: 22.08% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0024 | 1 032 | Bureau 94081_0024: 20.69% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0025 | 831 | Bureau 94081_0025: 28.27% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0028 | 1 128 | Bureau 94081_0028: 21.34% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0029 | 1 050 | Bureau 94081_0029: 22.89% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0030 | 670 | Bureau 94081_0030: 27.02% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0037 | 1 017 | Bureau 94081_0037: 22.93% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0038 | 892 | Bureau 94081_0038: 28.83% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0043 | 902 | Bureau 94081_0043: 21.94% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0044 | 923 | Bureau 94081_0044: 22.29% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 94081_0045 | 847 | Bureau 94081_0045: 20.64% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 95250_0001 | 1 012 | Bureau 95250_0001: 33.9% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 95250_0002 | 1 100 | Bureau 95250_0002: 31.42% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 95250_0003 | 908 | Bureau 95250_0003: 44.8% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 95250_0004 | 842 | Bureau 95250_0004: 52.2% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 95250_0005 | 515 | Bureau 95250_0005: 44.63% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 95250_0006 | 999 | Bureau 95250_0006: 39.13% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 95250_0007 | 927 | Bureau 95250_0007: 55.29% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 97403_0004 | 1 136 | Bureau 97403_0004: nuls 10.95% vs moyenne dept ZD = 3.6% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 97413_0018 | 951 | Bureau 97413_0018: nuls 11.87% vs moyenne dept ZD = 3.6% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 97605_0114 | 421 | Bureau 97605_0114: nuls 7.09% vs moyenne dept ZM = 1.8% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 98890_0011 | 562 | Bureau 98890_0011: nuls 9.5% vs moyenne dept ZN = 1.9% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 98734_0002 | 1 166 | Bureau 98734_0002: nuls 3.51% vs moyenne dept ZP = 1.1% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 03101_0002 | 775 | Bureau 03101_0002: nuls 11.54% vs moyenne dept 03 = 3.5% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 04070_0005 | 76 | Bureau 04070_0005: nuls 18.84% vs moyenne dept 04 = 6.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 13047_0009 | 652 | Bureau 13047_0009: nuls 10.55% vs moyenne dept 13 = 3.1% |
| high | participation_outlier | 29124_0001 | 930 | Bureau 29124_0001: participation 0% vs moyenne dept 29 = 62.0% (σ=14.1, z-score=4.39) |
| high | participation_outlier | 29124_0002 | 877 | Bureau 29124_0002: participation 0% vs moyenne dept 29 = 62.0% (σ=14.1, z-score=4.39) |
| high | participation_outlier | 29124_0003 | 821 | Bureau 29124_0003: participation 0% vs moyenne dept 29 = 62.0% (σ=14.1, z-score=4.39) |
| high | participation_outlier | 29124_0004 | 869 | Bureau 29124_0004: participation 0% vs moyenne dept 29 = 62.0% (σ=14.1, z-score=4.39) |
| high | participation_outlier | 29124_0005 | 737 | Bureau 29124_0005: participation 0% vs moyenne dept 29 = 62.0% (σ=14.1, z-score=4.39) |
| high | participation_outlier | 29124_0006 | 759 | Bureau 29124_0006: participation 0% vs moyenne dept 29 = 62.0% (σ=14.1, z-score=4.39) |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 29024_0004 | 936 | Bureau 29024_0004: nuls 11.79% vs moyenne dept 29 = 3.6% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 31232_0006 | 232 | Bureau 31232_0006: nuls 10.11% vs moyenne dept 31 = 2.8% |
| high | participation_outlier | 35093_0005 | 870 | Bureau 35093_0005: participation 100% vs moyenne dept 35 = 61.7% (σ=9.5, z-score=4.04) |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 35093_0005 | 870 | Bureau 35093_0005: nuls 30.34% vs moyenne dept 35 = 2.7% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 38189_0001 | 1 600 | Bureau 38189_0001: nuls 26.77% vs moyenne dept 38 = 2.5% |
Scores par département
94
96
85
98
ZM
99
04
99
28
99
39
99
41
99
51
99
62
99
74
99
75
99
95
99
ZA
100
ZB
100
ZC
100
ZD
100
ZN
100
ZP
100
ZS
100
01
100
02
100
03
100
05
100
06
100
07
100
08
100
09
100
10
100
11
100
12
100
13
100
14
100
15
100
16
100
18
100
19
100
2A
100
2B
100
21
100
22
100
24
100
25
100
26
100
27
100
29
100
30
100
31
100
32
100
33
100
34
100
35
100
37
100
38
100
40
100
42
100
43
100
44
100
45
100
46
100
47
100
48
100
49
100
50
100
53
100
54
100
55
100
56
100
57
100
58
100
60
100
63
100
64
100
66
100
67
100
68
100
69
100
70
100
71
100
72
100
73
100
76
100
77
100
78
100
79
100
80
100
81
100
82
100
83
100
84
100
86
100
87
100
88
100
89
100
90
100
91
100
92
100
93
100
Bureaux à auditer en priorité
35093_000545/100Audit prioritaire38189_000145/100Audit prioritaire63113_002545/100Audit prioritaire74133_000245/100Audit prioritaire95250_000749/100Audit prioritaire95250_000450/100Anomalie notable62193_001251/100Anomalie notable62193_003451/100Anomalie notable95250_000353/100Anomalie notable95250_000553/100Anomalie notable94081_001354/100Anomalie notable95250_000654/100Anomalie notable95250_000156/100Anomalie notable94081_001258/100Anomalie notable94081_002559/100Anomalie notable94081_003859/100Anomalie notable95250_000259/100Anomalie notable94081_003060/100Anomalie notable94081_000661/100Anomalie notable94081_001161/100Anomalie notable