Législatives 2002 — Tour 1
63 394 bureaux · 40 225 555 inscrits · Participation moy. 66.0%
Score d'intégrité global
100
Arithmétique
poids: 30%
99
Statistique
poids: 25%
100
Historique
poids: 25%
100
Distribution
poids: 10%
100
Complétude
poids: 10%
Distribution par bureau
62 208
Cohérent (90+)
1 108
Léger (75-89)
68
Notable (50-74)
10
Prioritaire (<50)
Top anomalies (2 179 total)
| Sévérité | Type | Bureau | Inscrits | Explication |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| high | high_null_rate | 02413_0001 | 162 | Bureau 02413_0001: 22.3% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 45255_0001 | 326 | Bureau 45255_0001: 32.58% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 47170_0002 | 106 | Bureau 47170_0002: 22.22% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 65361_0001 | 79 | Bureau 65361_0001: 26.42% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 76322_0021 | 919 | Bureau 76322_0021: 46.01% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 80193_0001 | 90 | Bureau 80193_0001: 100% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 80202_0001 | 227 | Bureau 80202_0001: 100% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 80575_0001 | 70 | Bureau 80575_0001: 100% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 80644_0001 | 416 | Bureau 80644_0001: 100% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 80736_0001 | 165 | Bureau 80736_0001: 100% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 80826_0001 | 649 | Bureau 80826_0001: 100% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 86009_0001 | 777 | Bureau 86009_0001: 23.74% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 86031_0001 | 709 | Bureau 86031_0001: 20.5% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 86031_0002 | 532 | Bureau 86031_0002: 22.01% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 86032_0001 | 1 412 | Bureau 86032_0001: 20.62% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 86277_0001 | 233 | Bureau 86277_0001: 21.18% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 86298_0002 | 397 | Bureau 86298_0002: 25.18% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | high_null_rate | 97132_0008 | 394 | Bureau 97132_0008: 21.84% de votes nuls (seuil: 10%) |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 01033_0006 | 636 | Bureau 01033_0006: nuls 7.51% vs moyenne dept 01 = 2.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 01081_0001 | 415 | Bureau 01081_0001: nuls 9.42% vs moyenne dept 01 = 2.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 01189_0001 | 297 | Bureau 01189_0001: nuls 7.14% vs moyenne dept 01 = 2.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 02036_0001 | 65 | Bureau 02036_0001: nuls 16.95% vs moyenne dept 02 = 2.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 02076_0001 | 61 | Bureau 02076_0001: nuls 9.62% vs moyenne dept 02 = 2.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 02229_0001 | 60 | Bureau 02229_0001: nuls 10.2% vs moyenne dept 02 = 2.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 02413_0001 | 162 | Bureau 02413_0001: nuls 22.3% vs moyenne dept 02 = 2.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 02417_0001 | 83 | Bureau 02417_0001: nuls 9.09% vs moyenne dept 02 = 2.0% |
| high | participation_outlier | 03185_0020 | 600 | Bureau 03185_0020: participation 44.5% vs moyenne dept 03 = 67.6% (σ=5.4, z-score=4.26) |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 03123_0001 | 191 | Bureau 03123_0001: nuls 9.09% vs moyenne dept 03 = 2.7% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 03143_0001 | 113 | Bureau 03143_0001: nuls 9.38% vs moyenne dept 03 = 2.7% |
| high | participation_outlier | 06055_0001 | 136 | Bureau 06055_0001: participation 91.18% vs moyenne dept 06 = 61.5% (σ=6.8, z-score=4.37) |
| high | participation_outlier | 06088_0059 | 638 | Bureau 06088_0059: participation 33.7% vs moyenne dept 06 = 61.5% (σ=6.8, z-score=4.10) |
| high | participation_outlier | 06088_0191 | 566 | Bureau 06088_0191: participation 30.21% vs moyenne dept 06 = 61.5% (σ=6.8, z-score=4.61) |
| high | participation_outlier | 06088_0240 | 881 | Bureau 06088_0240: participation 33.48% vs moyenne dept 06 = 61.5% (σ=6.8, z-score=4.13) |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 06051_0001 | 124 | Bureau 06051_0001: nuls 9.3% vs moyenne dept 06 = 1.5% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 06074_0002 | 68 | Bureau 06074_0002: nuls 7.5% vs moyenne dept 06 = 1.5% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 07075_0002 | 63 | Bureau 07075_0002: nuls 7.14% vs moyenne dept 07 = 1.9% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 07133_0001 | 67 | Bureau 07133_0001: nuls 6.98% vs moyenne dept 07 = 1.9% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 07136_0002 | 51 | Bureau 07136_0002: nuls 13.33% vs moyenne dept 07 = 1.9% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 08069_0002 | 69 | Bureau 08069_0002: nuls 11.36% vs moyenne dept 08 = 1.7% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 08393_0001 | 51 | Bureau 08393_0001: nuls 9.52% vs moyenne dept 08 = 1.7% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 10069_0001 | 107 | Bureau 10069_0001: nuls 11.76% vs moyenne dept 10 = 2.3% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 10242_0001 | 168 | Bureau 10242_0001: nuls 10.34% vs moyenne dept 10 = 2.3% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 10445_0001 | 52 | Bureau 10445_0001: nuls 10% vs moyenne dept 10 = 2.3% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 11235_0001 | 80 | Bureau 11235_0001: nuls 10.53% vs moyenne dept 11 = 2.6% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 12262_0003 | 85 | Bureau 12262_0003: nuls 10.53% vs moyenne dept 12 = 3.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 12296_0002 | 92 | Bureau 12296_0002: nuls 10.96% vs moyenne dept 12 = 3.0% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 13014_0009 | 880 | Bureau 13014_0009: nuls 6.13% vs moyenne dept 13 = 1.8% |
| high | null_rate_outlier | 13047_0009 | 579 | Bureau 13047_0009: nuls 5.92% vs moyenne dept 13 = 1.8% |
| high | participation_outlier | 14118_21.1 | 785 | Bureau 14118_21.1: participation 37.45% vs moyenne dept 14 = 64.8% (σ=6.3, z-score=4.37) |
| high | participation_outlier | 14741_0001 | 53 | Bureau 14741_0001: participation 90.57% vs moyenne dept 14 = 64.8% (σ=6.3, z-score=4.10) |
Scores par département
86
97
2B
99
46
99
58
99
65
99
80
99
88
99
90
99
ZA
99
ZB
99
ZC
99
01
100
02
100
03
100
04
100
05
100
06
100
07
100
08
100
09
100
10
100
11
100
12
100
13
100
14
100
15
100
16
100
17
100
18
100
19
100
2A
100
21
100
22
100
23
100
24
100
25
100
26
100
27
100
28
100
29
100
30
100
31
100
32
100
33
100
34
100
35
100
36
100
37
100
38
100
39
100
40
100
41
100
42
100
43
100
44
100
45
100
47
100
48
100
49
100
50
100
51
100
52
100
53
100
54
100
55
100
56
100
57
100
59
100
60
100
61
100
62
100
63
100
64
100
66
100
67
100
68
100
69
100
70
100
72
100
73
100
74
100
75
100
76
100
77
100
78
100
79
100
81
100
82
100
83
100
84
100
85
100
87
100
89
100
91
100
92
100
93
100
94
100
95
100
ZD
100
Bureaux à auditer en priorité
45255_000145/100Audit prioritaire76322_002145/100Audit prioritaire80193_000145/100Audit prioritaire80202_000145/100Audit prioritaire80575_000145/100Audit prioritaire80644_000145/100Audit prioritaire80736_000145/100Audit prioritaire80826_000145/100Audit prioritaire02413_000148/100Audit prioritaire47170_000248/100Audit prioritaire21362_000151/100Anomalie notable65361_000151/100Anomalie notable57025_000253/100Anomalie notable2B193_000154/100Anomalie notable02036_000155/100Anomalie notable97132_000856/100Anomalie notable16398_000158/100Anomalie notable86298_000258/100Anomalie notable86009_000160/100Anomalie notable62372_000161/100Anomalie notable